> Even so, he overestimates how large a shadow Schindler's List cast over
> Jurassic Park. I'd argue they're equally recognized by society at large.
Ahh, of course it'd be you to dig up my ancient (and largely naive) posts here!
In my defence, I will say that come awards season of 1993, nobody was thinking of Jurassic Park. And I think that's what CC was referring to in his review. Naturally, JP is a staple of the blockbuster industry. I don't think anyone could argue otherwise.