|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: they all sound the same > If you compare John's earlier stuff before "Towering Inferno"
> and the ratings on his scores to James's earlier stuff from when he first
> started you can tell that James Horner got into his prime in score
> composing a lot faster then John did. But the only reason John has more 5
> star ratings is because he has been in the business longer. When John was
> the age were Honer is at now he wasn't nearly as popular as James is. If
> you compare "Legends of the Fall" to "The Reivers" you
> will be able to see that James is the better composer. Almost No one knows
> about John's earlier stuff but Im sure James Honer scores will be
> remembered in history. When James Horner becomes the age that John is at
> right now Im sure that his scores will surpass anything John could ever
> do. That's why you can't relate John to James because of the time gap. If
> you wait another 25 years then James will be at the stage where John is at
> now. Plus James Horner music has 10 times more depth then John. JAMES
> HORNER ALL THE WAY!!!!
They will be remembered, because all sound the same. The only repetitive score of Horner I like is Enemy At The Gates.
I don't think also that Pelican's Brief would be remembered. It is the worst score composed by Horner, not to mention anybody in scoring community. I think it could be written by Horner's CAT walking on the piano!
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- I don't understand (15355 views)
Dan Sartori - Sunday, May 12, 2002, at 2:58 p.m.
- How about Zimmer and Media Ventures... (14955 views)
Levente Benedek - Sunday, June 2, 2002, at 10:53 a.m.
- Re: I don't understand (14720 views)
Lokutus - Sunday, May 19, 2002, at 10:09 a.m.
- doltishness ! (14797 views)
Roman Dlouhy´ - Friday, June 14, 2002, at 2:47 a.m.
- Hey! Shut up, you two! (14757 views)
Bindner - Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 10:10 a.m.
- Try something new (14649 views)
Bubba - Sunday, May 19, 2002, at 3:20 p.m.
- Re: I don't understand (15277 views)
Matt - Monday, May 13, 2002, at 6:34 p.m.
- Re: I don't understand (14671 views)
ChrisAfonso - Monday, May 13, 2002, at 2:14 p.m.
- Agreed 100 percent! And I'm NOT a JW fan... (14782 views)
Vestard - Monday, May 13, 2002, at 4:43 a.m.
- Re: Agreed 100 percent! And I'm NOT a JW fan... (14629 views)
Korben - Monday, July 15, 2002, at 10:41 a.m.
- Hilarious!!! (14945 views)
Erik Woods - Monday, May 13, 2002, at 8:57 a.m.
- Re: Hilarious!!! (14712 views)
ethan[imf] - Monday, May 13, 2002, at 12:06 p.m.
- Re: Hilarious!!! (14893 views)
Erik Woods - Monday, May 13, 2002, at 1:08 p.m.
- Re: Hilarious!!! (14668 views)
ethan[imf] - Tuesday, May 14, 2002, at 4:47 a.m.
- Re: Hilarious!!! (14627 views)
Randall - Friday, July 19, 2002, at 9:06 a.m.
- Re: Hilarious!!! (14580 views)
Pawel Stroinski - Tuesday, August 27, 2002, at 3:35 a.m.
- Re: question (14777 views)
Sean Raduechel - Sunday, May 12, 2002, at 6:58 p.m.
- Good point (14912 views)
Dan Sartori - Monday, May 13, 2002, at 8:28 a.m.
|
|
|
|