Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
     1. Pinocchio
    2. The Woman King
   3. Samaritan
  4. The Gray Man
 5. Prey
6. Bullet Train
         1. Dune (2021)
        2. Spider-Man
       3. Alice in Wonderland
      4. Encanto
     5. Batman
    6. Wonder Woman 1984
   7. No Time to Die
  8. Ghostbusters: Afterlife
 9. Murder on the Orient Express
10. LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring
Home Page
Archives:   2000-2006 | 2006-2015 | 2015-2021
Menu Options ▼

Edit | Delete
Re: How much of our love of scores can be classified objective?
Profile Image
• Posted by: AhN   <Send E-Mail>
• Date: Monday, June 27, 2022, at 5:48 p.m.
• IP Address:
• In Response to: Re: How much of our love of scores can be clas... (Bernhard H. Heidkamp)

> I actually think it's almost completely subjective.

> To use your example: IF an instrument is out of tune, we would consider
> that bad.

> But what about tracks like 'Bad Orchestra' from ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE
> WEST, which purposefully uses out of tune instruments? Then we applaud it!

> Another example with another parameter: Many of us would agree, that THE
> LORD OF THE RINGS is a masterpiece for it's intricate and sophisticated
> use of leitmotifs. But then scores, like my beloved favourite score THE
> LAST AIRBENDER would be bad, because it doesn't feature leitmotifs.

> In the last couple of years, I came to the realisation, that every
> 'objective' critical analysis of something hinges on parameters that were
> chosen subjectively.

> When *I* choose to evaluate a score by it's themes and motifs, it's a
> choice that *I* made. I chose that aspect to be an important one. Others
> might disagree though.

> To move that topic to movies: We criticize movies when they don't have a
> coherent script or lacking character work. If I just put this out there,
> many would agree that these things make a film objectively bad.

> So why do so many agree that 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEA is a masterpiece? We
> don't meet the main character halfway through the movie and let's be
> honest...he isn't the most compelling one. Obviously, that movie does this
> on purpose and it's brilliant, but do you see the point I'm making?

> Even stuff like orchestrations and harmonies aren't objective. We tend to
> call scores that overly rely on rhythmic percussion 'simplistic' but that
> comes from a very western mindset rooted in western classical music. We're
> kinda devalueing a lot of african music by default, even if we don't
> intend to.

> And even if we agreed that complex orchestrations with a lot of
> counterpoint are what make a piece of music good...then suddenly a lot of
> LORD OF THE RINGS is kinda bad, as it's just string-carpets for long
> stretches of time.

> So my reasoning is: Objectivity exists only within certain parameters
> which have to be chosen subjectively beforehand. Then, when you have a
> community like us, where a lot of people share similar subjectively chosen
> parameters, you have a certain degree of objectivity within that certain
> group and even that objectivity is wonky and fragile as sometimes even two
> people who bth value, let's say, complex orchestration and both have
> enough knowledge about it, will disagree.

> And even this opinion piece on the topic of objectivity is trying to find
> an objective answer, while probably still being subjective, as I set a
> certain, subjectively chosen definition of these terms

1. Welcome back
2. In about a month I will send you Trek. At which I point I will actually decide which Trek to send you.
3. Most of my main response was originally going to be in response to you, so instead I'm throwing in here what I forgot to put in my main response:

A lot of the time the answer to "why do you like this music?" is simply "I like it because it punches stupid buttons in my brain that fire stupid chemicals that make me feel happy." Which is of course how I described my affection for the Matrix Resurrections score. Explain what aspects are punching what buttons and the kind of happiness it's giving you and boom, you're a pretty decent critic.

Messages in this Thread:     Expand >>

Copyright © 1998-2022, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.
Filmtracks takes no responsibility for any offense or mental trauma caused by this forum. Behold the Scoreboard motto to better understand why this party is relentlessly trolled.