![]() |
|
![]() |
| Newest Major Reviews: | . | | This Month's Most Popular Reviews: | | Best-Selling Albums: | ||
. |
1. Luck 2. Thirteen Lives 3. DC League of Super-Pets 4. Nope 5. The Man From Toronto | . | . |
1. Dune (2021) 2. Spider-Man 3. Alice in Wonderland 4. Encanto 5. Batman |
6. Wonder Woman 1984 7. No Time to Die 8. Ghostbusters: Afterlife 9. Murder on the Orient Express 10. LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring | . | . |
1. Space Battleship Yamato 2. John Williams in Vienna 3. Shang-Chi: Legend/Ten Rings 4. Glory 5. Superman (40th Anniversary) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Zachary Behrendt, you do a huge injustice to great literature | ![]() | ||
![]() |
| |||
Posted by: Roger Feigelson Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2006, at 9:43 p.m. IP Address: camarillo-cuda1v-113.ventca.adelphia.net In Response to: Objective and Subjective Analysis: Thaxton, Ford A. (Zachary Behrendt) |
> Ford,
> Blunt in context and grammatically undisciplined, your writing resembles the
> sort of stream-of-consciousness akin to the style of Nathaniel Hawthorne
> (The Scarlett Letter, The House of Seven Gables), who would go to great
> lengths to speak his mind on paper, disregarding cliches like punctuation
> and proper paragraph breaks. You seem to accomplish this better than
> Hawthorne, who's writings consist of paragraph-long run-on sentences and
> page-long paragraphs.
I was reading this horrifying thread about the Marxist oboe and I came across this stunningly offensive comment by Zachary Behrendt. I cannot believe that anyone would actually compare Ford A. Thaxton's writing favorably to Nathaniel Hawthorne. This statement is beyond incredible!
Messages in this Thread: ( Expand ) |
![]() |
![]() |