|||Newest Major Reviews:||.||||This Month's Most Popular Reviews:||||Best-Selling Albums:|
2. Jurassic World: Dominion
3. Operation Mincemeat
4. Doctor Strange: Multiverse
5. Sonic the Hedgehog 2
1. Dune (2021)|
3. Alice in Wonderland
6. Wonder Woman 1984|
7. No Time to Die
8. Ghostbusters: Afterlife
9. Murder on the Orient Express
10. LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring
1. Space Battleship Yamato|
2. John Williams in Vienna
3. Shang-Chi: Legend/Ten Rings
5. Superman (40th Anniversary)
|My problem with Shyamalan...|
| Posted by Josh |
Date: Thursday, July 27, 2006, at 10:31 a.m.
IP Address: hlfxns01bbf-142177229239.ns.aliant.net
In Response to: Re: My problem with The Sixth Sense... (Smalltown_Poets)
Shyamalan is an excellent director, an expert at evoking moods and imagery and, especially, at selling the film's plots, no matter how preposterous. That's why the Sixth Sense works - not because the ending makes sense - but because it *feels* convincing. At least, initially.
Of course, as time went on and Shyamalan's films, shall we say, "declined" in creative merit, one thing became apparent. However great a director he may be (and I think he is - I'd love to see him make a proper adaptation of The Time Machine), he's a horrible, horrible, HORRIBLE writer. The Village was my clearest clue - from the stilted dialogue to the incredibly pedestrian "twist" to the mixed message - it was an unmitigated disaster (well, the score was good, though...).
And now we have Lady in the Water - by most accounts another complete mess - in which Shyamalan literally casts himself as a writer who's work will change the world. I can think of nothing more self-aggrandizing. Hitchcock was happy with short, amusing cameos - and Shyamalan is no Hitchcock.
I think I will see Lady in the Water, though. From the sound of things, it will provide about two hours of unintentional entertainment.
| Acadia Math|
|Messages in this Thread: ( Expand )|