 |  | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| • | Newest Major Reviews: | . | • | This Month's Most Popular Reviews: | • | Best-Selling Albums: | ||
| . |
1. Lightyear 2. Jurassic World: Dominion 3. Operation Mincemeat 4. Doctor Strange: Multiverse 5. Sonic the Hedgehog 2 | . | . |
1. Dune (2021) 2. Spider-Man 3. Alice in Wonderland 4. Encanto 5. Batman |
6. Wonder Woman 1984 7. No Time to Die 8. Ghostbusters: Afterlife 9. Murder on the Orient Express 10. LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring | . | . |
1. Space Battleship Yamato 2. John Williams in Vienna 3. Shang-Chi: Legend/Ten Rings 4. Glory 5. Superman (40th Anniversary) |
 | ||||||||
|
|
| Re: Bouncing is what Triggers to best! |  | ||
 | |||
| |||
 | • Posted by Timmy B. • Date: Friday, July 28, 2006, at 10:09 p.m. • IP Address: 101.sub-66-174-93.myvzw.com • In Response to: Bouncing is what Triggers to best! (C. Hook) |
> Psychosis is not a personality disorder. Psychosis is a state of mind that
> can be triggered by stress, drugs, and other psychiatric ailments, but is
> not a constant, a condition or disorder. You could also be referring to
> psychopathy or anti-social personality disorder, but that bears little
> resemblence to what you describe. What exactly is it that you're talking
> about?
How are you deducing from the above the following? "If anything, I'm encouraging you to be careful and take command, within reason, of your therapy." That's an awfully nice sentiment that I highly appreciate, but I'm sure you could've done more to get this across in your original post. Instead, I interpreted your post as over-confident in stating that I couldn't have a psychotic "disorder" and condescending in assuming that you'd know better than me who has been diagnosed with this. I have no reason to think that you're qualified to make these statements about my diagnosis and yet you seem to try to invalidate my claim that I have a psychotic disorder... I would say that this is a reasonable interpretation of the material I inserted at the beginning of this post; this interpretation led me to be offended. Once again, I do appreciate your sentiment but don't see how it came across in your original post. I'm guessing that you thought it came across somehow, and I believe you--I'm just curious as to how you thought it came across.
Tim
P.S.--What is the extent of your knowledge of abnormal psychology?
| Messages in this Thread: ( Expand ) |
(views: 314)
 |
|
|