CLOSE WINDOW |
FILMTRACKS.COM
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VIEW ![]()
Review of Adaptation (Carter Burwell)
FILMTRACKS RECOMMENDS:
Buy it... if you are confused, if you like being confused by the nature of
life, and especially if you like music that is incongruous and confused.
Avoid it... if experimental scores dealing with existential issues frustrate you with their awkward and disturbed contemplations of the inner workings of the mind.
FILMTRACKS EDITORIAL REVIEW:
Adaptation: (Carter Burwell) The team of director,
screenwriter, and composer that brought you Being John Malkovich returned
in 2002 for a creative encore, one that even included parts of that prior film.
The story of Adaptation is one of evolution, life, frustration, and the
great unknown, and its primary character (played by Nicolas Cage) is a sexually
inadequate and mentally troubled screenwriter who is living a nightmare adapting
a novel into a screenplay for a movie. The cyclical nature of Charlie Kaufman's
idea for Adaptation, telling the tale of this exact film's formation in
such a way that it becomes a story within a story within a story, causes an
understandable potential for mind-boggling confusion. But that's the nature of
the film's exploration of psyche, eventually evolving into a larger existential
question and answer session that only those ready for heavy thought at the
cinema will appreciate. The audience is treated to Kaufman's problems with a
blunt slap across the head, and Carter Burwell's score emulates that feeling
perfectly. As Burwell states, it is difficult to write a score about nothing in
particular, and more specifically, a film about not knowing if there is anything
to know. He went ahead and had to score the film as though he personally knew
what both the film and the meaning of life are all about, and the resulting
collection of inharmonic clangs and suffering mutilations of overlapping motifs
makes for a ear-wrenching musical experience both in the film and alone on
album. Burwell's sense of humor about the project is perhaps the most intriguing
element of the work, for the music itself could easily drive a person (or
animal, for that matter) insane. There is inherent in Burwell's career a habit
of writing melodies that are not crisply harmonic, moving through progressions
with a slightly dissonant and rhythmically staggering personality. This style is
sometimes difficult to admire in more straightforward dramatic scores, and when
he intentionally adapts that sound into a realm of infinite experimentation of
thought, as is the case with Adaptation, the results are really quite
frightening. Trophies should be awarded to people who can fornicate to music as
disruptive as this.
Burwell's job of capturing the concept of mental instability is admirable, but the ideas associated with that construct are almost intolerable when presented alone on album. What he accomplishes for the film is exactly what that story requires: a dissonant, seemingly unorganized, occasionally messy, and always disjointed score for small orchestra and electronics. Of the three "themes" that run throughout the film and thus the score, the one for the primary character is written in an intentionally bizarre series of meandering, rising notes, disregarding harmonious keys at every turn. Interestingly, you can hear shades of Burwell's usual melodic sensibility peeking through in this idea (which is heard immediately in "The Evolution of the Screenwriter" and is used consistently throughout the score), and if it had been elaborated upon in a jazzy context, you might actually hear something similar to the composer's Conspiracy Theory. It's intentionally difficult to tolerate as standalone entertainment, and to even appreciate it as a form of artistic expression is almost as trying. In addition to the intent of the bizarre atmosphere, the life of the screenwriter is also pathetic, so Burwell's more melodic passages (or those less inhibited by random bangs, rumbling notes of no order, and synthetic effects) are those that mimic the clumsiness of a nerdy child. Only in the final cue, "The Unexpressed Expressed," does Burwell soothe the listener with a remotely coherent progression of theme, but by that point, you've been bombarded by so much confusing noise that your head will be spinning in a daze. Some of the samples that the composer uses are so obnoxious that they make the sounds of Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 an appealing proposition. The score is book-ended by even more ridiculously demented Fatboy Slim remixes of Burwell's music, including "The Screenwriter's Nightmare (Zeno Remix)," which, with its backwards edits and squishing of several recordings from the score into one minute of overlapping mayhem, is the single worst piece of film music to have been produced in years. The album oddly finishes with the far too happy tone of The Turtles' famous song "Happy Together." It's a complete 180-degree turn from the score and perhaps the only redeeming track on album. Overall, this score embodies confusion at both its best and worst. Save yourself the trauma. *
TRACK LISTINGS:
Total Time: 47:27
NOTES & QUOTES:
The insert includes pictures from the recording and mixing sessions, along
with the following note from Carter Burwell:
Musical equivalents evolved to help with this. The inharmonic overtones of struck metal and the plaintive sound of english horn suggested the random walk of mutation and the endless losses of natural selection, while also playing the confusion and sadness of the characters. Cyclical structures in the score mimic the meaningless engine of life and death, sad on the personal level but so awfully necessary for life itself, while also playing the spinning wheels of the creators of the story. Is there anything entertaining about looking into the mind of a creator? Wasn't postmodernism supposed to save us from considering the creator at all by seeing creation only in the eye of the beholder? Isn't it hopelessly modern for writers to write about the act of writing? And why do I have to write my own liner notes? I didn't want the music to state what the film is "about", since this ambiguity is one of the film's attractions, but to write these notes I have to pretend that I do in fact know what it's about. Unknowable, primordial soup of doubt? Meaningless engine of life and death? Would I have made any of these ridiculous claims if I didn't have to write these notes? And what's with all these rhetorical questions? Who do I think I am, Socrates? If he was so great, why didn't he make it to the final cut of the film? In the end, I guess that's the moral of the story, of evolution. That's why you read this. I made the cut."
Copyright ©
2003-2024, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. All artwork and sound clips from Adaptation are Copyright © 2002, Astralwerks and cannot be redistributed without the label's expressed written consent. Page created 2/4/03 and last updated 3/2/09. |