|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: 160 BPM.
Posted by: Lsnake <Send E-Mail> Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, at 5:49 a.m.
IP Address: static-88.131.64.82.addr.tdcsong.se
In Response to:
Re: 160 BPM. (Jeroen Buskes)
Now Playing: Work work work..
> Yeah, this cue is just awesome. I can't wait to see how this whole score
> works in the movie!
I agree. I'm so curious about how it blends in with the movie, it's already great outside of the movie but I'm looking forward to hear it in it. It's one of those rare times when a score makes you curious about a movie you'd normally not bother watching simply because the score is so good that it makes it essential to experiencing the whole thing together. (Like Craig Armstrong's World Trade Center score, a damn beautiful score that forced me to watch a movie I'd otherwise not bother with)
I can't stop praising this track, and the rest of the score is very, very good.
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- 160 BPM. (6312 views)
Lsnake - Monday, May 11, 2009, at 11:46 p.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5851 views)
Edmund Meinerts - Friday, November 20, 2009, at 1:52 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (6300 views)
Chris - Monday, May 11, 2009, at 11:51 p.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (6109 views)
Lsnake - Tuesday, May 12, 2009, at 4:55 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (6099 views)
Jeroen Buskes - Thursday, May 14, 2009, at 12:52 a.m.
-
Re: 160 BPM. (5866 views)
Lsnake - Monday, May 18, 2009, at 5:49 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5865 views)
Jeroen Buskes - Saturday, May 23, 2009, at 12:47 a.m.
|
|
|