the first movie was pretty good (it was pretty corny). the second movie ing ed!!
the first score was adequate, if presentable. the second score is predictable, repetitive, and irritating. don't even bother buying the score isolated from the movie, it is bad enough IN the movie. this score is a piece of !!!!!
sorry for all the rude comments, i just needed to get that out .

> the first movie was pretty good (it was pretty corny). the second movie
> ing ed!!
the first score was adequate, if presentable. the
> second score is predictable, repetitive, and irritating. don't even bother
> buying the score isolated from the movie, it is bad enough IN the movie.
> this score is a piece of !!!!!
sorry for all the rude comments, i
> just needed to get that out .

I disagree! The score to Men In Black II is just as good as the first one. The score is NOT irritating, and the end credits track offers some interesting and good music. The variations of the Men In Black theme are really cool. The score to the first Men In Black was not corny (hell, it got a well-deserved Oscar nomination!), and Men In Black II was a really good movie.

thank you for presenting the other side of the argument, good sir. i respect your opinion.

I didn't listen to this CD, I ate it. It was rather bland and nearly identicial to the MIB CD. It's nowhere near as tasty as THE ITALIAN JOB, which I enjoyed with some Australian import Merlot. I give this CD only *

> I didn't listen to this CD, I ate it. It was rather bland and nearly
> identicial to the MIB CD. It's nowhere near as tasty as THE ITALIAN JOB,
> which I enjoyed with some Australian import Merlot. I give this CD only *

I give your ridiculous comments only *!

> I give your ridiculous comments only *!

But Roger Ebert gave them ***, calling them inventive and "all about attitude"

But hey, at least I backed up my argument