Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
Composers
Awards
   NEWEST MAJOR REVIEWS:
     1. The Woman King
    2. Samaritan
   3. The Gray Man
  4. Prey
 5. Bullet Train
6. Luck
   CURRENT MOST POPULAR REVIEWS:
         1. Dune (2021)
        2. Spider-Man
       3. Alice in Wonderland
      4. Encanto
     5. Batman
    6. Wonder Woman 1984
   7. No Time to Die
  8. Ghostbusters: Afterlife
 9. Murder on the Orient Express
10. LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring
Home Page
Archives:   2000-2006 | 2006-2015 | 2015-2021
Menu Options ▼

Edit | Delete
Re: Zimmer, team, alums Pt 6 - RC 2008-10: Supes, Sequels, and Sherlock, oh my! (6g)
• Posted by: JB11sos
• Date: Monday, August 1, 2022, at 10:44 a.m.
• IP Address: 165.225.39.79
• In Response to: Re: Zimmer, team, alums Pt 6 - RC 2008-10: Sup... (Edmund Meinerts)

> I don't mind it precisely because the themes are worked in so well.
> One of the things that makes Powell's zaniest animated scores so enjoyable
> to me is that you'll often hear the same theme done in like 10 different
> musical genres, take a score like Robots for instance. The melodic
> cohesion makes up for the lack of stylistic cohesion and then some.
> 'Forbidden Friendship' is a pretty mild diversion by those standards!

That's sort of the point, though. Robots or Horton Hears a Who or whatever can handle (arguably even cry for) that level of zaniness; HTTYD and films like it cannot. Which is why, to your point, the stylistic diversion they went with was comparatively mild.

> I really don't mind that much if a composer takes a distinct approach to a
> key scene to help make it stand out, especially if it's done as a montage;
> to keep it in the animated realm, nobody dinks Goldsmith for the
> anachronistic 'Haircut', because a) it uses the main theme and b) it
> fucking rules.

I think we're sort of in agreement that if it's good enough, then people will put up with and even enjoy stylistic inconsistency, but I don't think that means it works as an approach in most instances. Not only does it not tend to lead to as great and iconic a cue as the two we've used as examples, but also, in more films than not, it just won't make sense.

If a bunch of people reviewed Mulan for the first time today, I think you'd see a lot of comments along the lines of "'Short Hair' is loads of fun and works beautifully in its scene, but it is stylistically jarring in the context of the score/film as a whole."

> I generally think too much variety is by far the lesser ill
> compared to too much sameness/homogeneity in a score;

Riley and Edmund, meet at dawn.

> stay true to your themes and I don't really care where you take them. smile

This is truly a Powell fanatic's motto.




Messages in this Thread:     Expand >>


Copyright © 1998-2022, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.
Filmtracks takes no responsibility for any offense or mental trauma caused by this forum. Behold the Scoreboard motto to better understand why this party is relentlessly trolled.