|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: 5 Stars
• Posted by: F <Send E-Mail>• Date: Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 11:14 a.m.
• IP Address: 62-36-173-44.dialup.uni2.es
• In Response to:
5 Stars (the_negotiator1)
> Why do we need to hear this? We don't.......but not everyone owns either
> of the HOME ALONE albums. If you listen to the album and judge it by it's
> score, it's a 5 star effort, easily.
So you must be a 5-STAR Horner fan.... 
I quite agree with filmtracks' review. I think HOME ALONE 2 is a good score, but almost as an extension of the first. This 2 CD DE LUXE edition (that argument about the correction of the tape speed sounds stupid) is a waste of sapce and time. We all already know which scores would GREATLY benefit from such an "expansion"... Honestly, HOME ALONE 2 wasnt one of them.
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- • 5 Stars (7434 views)
the_negotiator1 - Monday, March 10, 2003, at 12:52 p.m.
- Re: 5 Stars (6868 views)
a different Joe - Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 3:47 p.m.
- Re: 5 Stars (6603 views)
the_negotiator1 - Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 7:09 p.m.
- Re: 5 Stars (6655 views)
the_negotiator1 - Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 7:05 p.m.
-
Re: 5 Stars (6653 views)
F - Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 11:14 a.m.
- Re: 5 Stars (6900 views)
Tim - Wednesday, October 4, 2006, at 9:39 a.m.
|
|
|
