> I read most of the comments. There's just not enough time to respond to
> all of them.

I'm sorry if it sounds like I've joined the wailing bunch who have nothing better to do than say you bash "all" Zimmer scores, which you clearly do not.

However, I am still very puzzled as to why you make such a big deal over the "getting on you nerves/listenablity" of the score, when you don't let this factor affect the overall rating for many others (I know I keep referring to "Jaws" but it's a clear example of a lack of continuity, and surely even you'd rather spend an afternoon listening to a quirky Matchstick Men score than a load of choppy strings trying tos care the out of you?)