> Spider-Man is different to Batman, and it has to be really. You can't just
> have two things the same. And Spider-Man ultimately suceeds where it can
> do what Batman couldn't do, use more hi-tech advances to make the villain
> decidedly evil, and the superhero amazing. His repetition of certain
> themes leave the audience under no illusions that this is immense. And it
> complents the film so well. It should be no wonder that this seems to be
> above what Batman could do. All in all it is a great film and a great
> score. As scores go this could take some beating. Batman doesn't even come
> close to this. And nor do many others he's composed. Comparing this to
> Batman is like composing it to David Arnold's bond. An unfair unjust
> comparison.

Batman is just as good as Spider-Man, they are both class. It would be foolish to diss Batman though