|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: 160 BPM.
Posted by: Jeroen Buskes Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, at 12:52 a.m.
IP Address: cp1211309-a.venlo1.lb.home.nl
In Response to:
Re: 160 BPM. (Lsnake)
> I agree. Still quite a few promising scores left this year, but one of my
> first thoughts when I heard 160 BPM was how damn good it was. Very intense
> and powerful, and one of the best action cues I've heard from Zimmer. I
> love most of his works, and I've long waited for a return to his older
> sounds. 160 BPM is one of those, it got the vitality, speed and energy of
> a young composer pouring all his energy into it, and the experience of a
> veteran in the business of movie scores.
> It's just wicked brilliant the way he handles the score and how the male
> and female choirs almost compete in rapid progression.
Yeah, this cue is just awesome. I can't wait to see how this whole score works in the movie!
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- 160 BPM. (6040 views)
Lsnake - Monday, May 11, 2009, at 11:46 p.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5603 views)
Edmund Meinerts - Friday, November 20, 2009, at 1:52 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (6049 views)
Chris - Monday, May 11, 2009, at 11:51 p.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5858 views)
Lsnake - Tuesday, May 12, 2009, at 4:55 a.m.
-
Re: 160 BPM. (5861 views)
Jeroen Buskes - Thursday, May 14, 2009, at 12:52 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5621 views)
Lsnake - Monday, May 18, 2009, at 5:49 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5623 views)
Jeroen Buskes - Saturday, May 23, 2009, at 12:47 a.m.
|
|
|