|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: 160 BPM.
Posted by: Lsnake <Send E-Mail> Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, at 4:55 a.m.
IP Address: static-88.131.64.82.addr.tdcsong.se
In Response to:
Re: 160 BPM. (Chris)
> I've got to say that the 160 BPM cue is probably one of the best, if not
> the best cue I've heard this year. It covers so many different layers and
> sounds and can be both beautiful yet full of action at the same time. A
> truly unique listening experience, even if you've got issues with Mr.
> Zimmer's over-reliance on synths.
I agree. Still quite a few promising scores left this year, but one of my first thoughts when I heard 160 BPM was how damn good it was. Very intense and powerful, and one of the best action cues I've heard from Zimmer. I love most of his works, and I've long waited for a return to his older sounds. 160 BPM is one of those, it got the vitality, speed and energy of a young composer pouring all his energy into it, and the experience of a veteran in the business of movie scores.
It's just wicked brilliant the way he handles the score and how the male and female choirs almost compete in rapid progression.
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- 160 BPM. (6040 views)
Lsnake - Monday, May 11, 2009, at 11:46 p.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5603 views)
Edmund Meinerts - Friday, November 20, 2009, at 1:52 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (6049 views)
Chris - Monday, May 11, 2009, at 11:51 p.m.
-
Re: 160 BPM. (5859 views)
Lsnake - Tuesday, May 12, 2009, at 4:55 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5861 views)
Jeroen Buskes - Thursday, May 14, 2009, at 12:52 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5621 views)
Lsnake - Monday, May 18, 2009, at 5:49 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5623 views)
Jeroen Buskes - Saturday, May 23, 2009, at 12:47 a.m.
|
|
|