|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: 160 BPM.
Posted by: Jeroen Buskes Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, at 12:47 a.m.
IP Address: cp1211309-a.venlo1.lb.home.nl
In Response to:
Re: 160 BPM. (Lsnake)
> I agree. I'm so curious about how it blends in with the movie, it's
> already great outside of the movie but I'm looking forward to hear it in
> it. It's one of those rare times when a score makes you curious about a
> movie you'd normally not bother watching simply because the score is so
> good that it makes it essential to experiencing the whole thing together.
> (Like Craig Armstrong's World Trade Center score, a damn beautiful score
> that forced me to watch a movie I'd otherwise not bother with)
> I can't stop praising this track, and the rest of the score is very, very
> good.
Well, i saw the movie and i can tell you that the score works wonders in the movie! There are some beautiful cues that are not on the soundtrack, but for the most part, we got the best parts of the music.
Anyway, there are some brilliant moments in the movie because of the music, and let me tell you that the pseudo-ending of the movie is beautiful! The whole movie theatre was just dumbstruck by the whole sequence and ofcourse the music. A wonderful moment to experience!
Now.. i want to see the movie again!
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- 160 BPM. (6040 views)
Lsnake - Monday, May 11, 2009, at 11:46 p.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5603 views)
Edmund Meinerts - Friday, November 20, 2009, at 1:52 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (6049 views)
Chris - Monday, May 11, 2009, at 11:51 p.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5858 views)
Lsnake - Tuesday, May 12, 2009, at 4:55 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5860 views)
Jeroen Buskes - Thursday, May 14, 2009, at 12:52 a.m.
- Re: 160 BPM. (5621 views)
Lsnake - Monday, May 18, 2009, at 5:49 a.m.
-
Re: 160 BPM. (5623 views)
Jeroen Buskes - Saturday, May 23, 2009, at 12:47 a.m.
|
|
|