|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: No, it won´t. Posted by: TUBA <Send E-Mail> Date: Thursday, June 14, 2007, at 7:43 a.m.
IP Address: adsl-75-46-61-138.dsl.sfldmi.sbcglobal.net
In Response to:
No, it won´t. (Cesar)
> Lot of crap is entertaining.
Sigh...
The music is entertaining, meaning that your accusations of simplicity don't matter at the point where I like the score. (see movie music uk for an explanation of that)
Not to mention that it really isn't that simplistic. Yes, similar chord progressions to other Zimmer scores and a few takeoffs from King Arthur, but simplistic? Did you listen to Up is Down? Or I Don't Think Now is The Best Time? Come on, those alone should be enough to shatter your claim that this is the second most simple score of all time.
> Yes. I have heard some Santaollala. Point?
That you've listened to Santaollala and still think Dead Man's Chest is the most simplistic score ever makes me think your bias plays too much into this. Obviously those bold, epic, sweeping, and complex themes of Brokeback Mountain must really send that complexity-loving part of your brain spinning.
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- Probably the most simplistic score I ever heard... (35823 views)
Cesar - Wednesday, May 30, 2007, at 3:48 p.m.
- This will suffice: It's entertaining and haven't you heard Santaollala? *NM* (35396 views)
TUBA - Wednesday, June 13, 2007, at 4:18 p.m.
- No, it won´t. (35388 views)
Cesar - Thursday, June 14, 2007, at 12:30 a.m.
-
Re: No, it won´t. (35297 views)
TUBA - Thursday, June 14, 2007, at 7:43 a.m.
- Re: Probably the most simplistic score I ever heard... (35434 views)
mikko - Friday, June 1, 2007, at 8:13 a.m.
- Re: Probably the most simplistic score I ever heard... (35772 views)
Euphman - Wednesday, May 30, 2007, at 5:03 p.m.
|
|
|
|